Is no news good news or bad news? In Iraq, it seems good news is deemed no
news. There has been striking success in the past few months in the
attempt to improve security, defeat al-Qaeda sympathisers and create
the political conditions in which a settlement between the Shia and the
Sunni communities can be reached. This has not been an accident but the
consequence of a strategy overseen by General David Petraeus in the
past several months. While summarised by the single word “surge” his
efforts have not just been about putting more troops on the ground but
also employing them in a more sophisticated manner. This drive has
effectively broken whatever alliances might have been struck in the
past by terrorist factions and aggrieved Sunnis. Cities such as
Fallujah, once notorious centres of slaughter, have been transformed in
a remarkable time.
Indeed, on every relevant measure, the shape of the Petraeus curve
is profoundly encouraging. It is not only the number of coalition
deaths and injuries that has fallen sharply (October was the best month
for 18 months and the second-best in almost four years), but the number
of fatalities among Iraqi civilians has also tumbled similarly. This
process started outside Baghdad but now even the capital itself has a
sense of being much less violent and more viable. As we report today,
something akin to a normal nightlife is beginning to re-emerge in the
city. As the pace of reconstruction quickens, the prospects for
economic recovery will be enhanced yet further. With oil at record high
prices, Iraq should be an extremely prosperous nation and in a position
to start planning for its future with confidence.
None of this means that all the past difficulties have become
history. A weakened al-Qaeda will be tempted to attempt more
spectacular attacks to inflict substantial loss of life in an effort to
prove that it remains in business. Although the tally of car bombings
and improvised explosive devices has fallen back sharply, it would only
take one blast directed at an especially large crowd or a holy site of
unusual reverence for the headlines about impending civil war to be
allowed another outing. The Government headed by Prime Minister Nouri
al-Maliki has become more proactive since the summer, but must
immediately take advantage of these favourable conditions. The supposed
representatives of the Iraqi people in Baghdad need to show both
responsibility and creativity if the country's potential is to be
realised.
The current achievements, and they are achievements, are being
treated as almost an embarrassment in certain quarters. The entire
context of the contest for the Democratic nomination for president has
been based on the conclusion that Iraq is an absolute disaster and the
first task of the next president is to extricate the United States at
maximum speed. Democrats who voted for the war have either repudiated
their past support completely (John Edwards) or engaged in a convoluted
partial retraction (Hillary Clinton). Congressional Democrats have
spent most of this year trying (and failing) to impose a timetable for
an outright exit. In Britain, in a somewhat more subtle fashion
admittedly, Gordon Brown assumed on becoming the Prime Minister that he
should send signals to the voters that Iraq had been “Blair's War”, not
one to which he or Britain were totally
All of these attitudes have become outdated. There are many valid
complaints about the manner in which the Bush Administration and Donald
Rumsfeld, in particular, managed Iraq after the 2003 military victory.
But not to recognise that matters have improved vastly in the year
since Mr Rumsfeld's resignation from the Pentagon was announced and
General Petraeus was liberated would be ridiculous. Politicians on both
sides of the Atlantic have to appreciate that Iraq is no longer, as
they thought, an exercise in damage limitation but one of making the
most of an opportunity. The instinct of too many people is that if Iraq
is going badly we should get out because it is going badly and if it is
getting better we should get out because it is getting better. This is
a catastrophic miscalculation. Iraq is getting better. That is good,
not bad, news.
About
the Author: Click on the link to read the comments. Times Online
It seems that even the press in the UK
understands that our press in the US is trying to manipulate the
elections rather than report the news. When did we elect our news
casters to represent the will of the people? Clark - Carryconcealed.net
Posted on
Sat, June 28, 2008
by The Times Online