This
year marks the 20th year that “Central View” has appeared each week in
newspapers across the “central” part of our great land. The readers of
“Central View” are probably not the kind of folks whose personal habits
are likely to fan the flames of hatred among Muslims such as Osama bin
Laden and other adherents of radical Islam. Indeed, except for radical
Islamists who figure their only way of admittance to Paradise is to
kill non-Muslims, the vast majority of traditional Muslims might find
much in common with the readers of this column.
For example, traditional Muslims are offended by TV programs
like “Two and a Half Men,” by song lyrics from 2 Live Crew and by
British TV programs such as “Footballers Wives,” and “Couplings.” They
conclude (wrongly, one hopes) that such behaviors are representative of
life in America and Great Britain. So, maybe, all this terrorism
directed against Americans and Britons is just a bad case of mistaken
identity. Apparently, just as we have difficulty distinguishing Sunnis
from Shiites or Arabs from Iranians, the radical Islamists can’t tell
Madonna from Mother Theresa.
But, if you read The Enemy at Home by Dinesh D’Souza,
you find that our perceived immorality is only part of the problem many
Muslims have with America and the West. Perhaps, of even greater
concern to even traditional Islamists are U.S. foreign and cultural
policies which Osama bin Laden contends are direct attacks on Islam.
Hold the phone. Readers of this column haven’t been attacking
Islam. Prior to 9/11, most Americans never gave Islam a second thought.
Yet, admittedly, at the foreign policy level, one of the facets of the
Cold War was our support for regimes whose leaders (according to bin
Laden) were more interested in frolics with prostitutes in Paris than
adhering to the tenets of the Islamic religion. Specifically, bin Laden
cites our alliances with Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait and the
United Arab Emirates.
But wait. There’s even more. Even traditional Islamists go on
to assert that a host of western governmental and non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) aggressively target Muslim families in an effort
to convert them to ways of living that are contrary to the teachings of
the Koran and Islam.
But, before listing just some of the organizations Osama bin
Laden finds offensive, let’s set aside the canard about radical Islam
being a response to the Crusades. Even the radical Islamists know the
Crusades were the Christian response to the sacking of Jerusalem
by the armies of Islam. In their heart of hearts, they know the
Crusades would never have taken place had the Islamic armies not sacked
and occupied Jerusalem.
So, when Osama bin Laden complains about crusaders, he is
really referring to the “crusading” efforts by: the ACLU, People for
the American Way, Center for Democratic Development, Center for
Constitutional Rights, Feminist Majority Foundation, Human Rights
Watch, National Abortion Rights Action League, National Organization of
Women, Global Fund for Women, Women Living Under Muslim Laws,
International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, Al Fatiha
Foundation (for gay, bisexual, and transgender Muslims),Women’s Global
Network for Reproductive Rights, Planned Parenthood, National Endowment
for the Arts, Americans United for Separation of Church and State,
Amnesty International, and certain programs funded by the U.S.
Department of State and the United Nations.
As Walt Kelly’s Pogo famously said, “We have met the enemy and
he is us.” Who knew those organizations were spending billions to try
to get Muslims to conform to their world view? While that doesn’t
excuse violence, one might understand why Osama bin Laden is ticked.
The great irony, of course, is that the same kinds of cultural
liberals Osama bin Laden despises are the same kinds of folks who are
trying to use their current majority in Congress to keep us from
defending ourselves from Osama bin Laden. Anyone who thinks that makes
sense has, obviously, forgotten to take their medication.
©2007. William Hamilton.
About
the Author:
Syndicated columnist, William Hamilton, is a Distinguished Graduate of
the U.S. Naval War College and a former research fellow at the U.S.
Military History Institute of the U.S. Army War College. He is the
co-author of The Grand Conspiracy and The Panama Conspiracy – two
thrillers about terrorism directed against the United States.
link text
Posted on
Saturday, June 28, 2008
by William Hamilton, J.D., Ph.D