We
are beginning to realize that we have been at war with the nation-state
of Iran and didn’t know it. It is a war that actually began in 1979
when Jimmy Carter pulled the Persian Rug out from under the pro-U.S,
anti-Soviet, Shah of Iran, and assisted the radical, Islamist mullah,
the Ayatollah Komeini, to come to power in Iran. Surely, Carter didn’t
intend for Iran to become an anti-U.S., radical-Islamic theocracy. But
that’s what happened.
Now, Iran has far larger designs than just tightening the grip
of radical, Shiite Islam on its people. While the demise of Saddam
Hussein made Iran’s western border more secure, the prospect of a
Sunni-controlled, western-oriented government in Iraq upsets the Shiite
theocrats of Iran. The reaction of the mullahs has been to ship tons of
munitions and hundreds of terrorists into Iraq.
It doesn’t take much imagination to see where the Iranians are
going with all this. They want a Shiite-controlled Iraq to be an
Iranian satellite. That, plus joining the nuclear club (either actually
or “play-pretend” like the late Saddam Hussein), would make Iran the
dominant power over the Persian Gulf.
That’s why the Sunni Arabs don’t want a U.S. withdrawal. But,
if we leave, Syria, Jordan and Turkey would move quickly to strengthen
their positions: Syria would probably annex Lebanon and also press
Israel for the return of the Golan Heights. Jordan would insist on
return of more of the West Bank. Turkey might slaughter its Kurdish
population. The Palestinians in Gaza might insist that the Arab
nation-states surrounding Israel try, yet again, to drive the Jews into
the sea. The U.N. would hold a meeting.
If the congressional Democrats succeed in driving U.S. forces
out of Iraq, the nuclear-armed, but small, Israeli Defense Force (IDF)
is left as the region’s leading military power. But ,without the Golan
Heights and the West Bank, the IDF would have to abandon conventional
weapons and go nuclear at almost the outset of hostilities. That is why
we may see the IDF and/or the U.S. eliminate Iran’s burgeoning nuclear
capabilities sometime before January, 2009.
The idea of a Shiite Iranian controlled Iraq has driven the
Sunni Arab nation-states to want to buy more defensive weapons from the
U.S. and that is what is happening right now.
Meanwhile, it might be useful to look at Iraq as a giant ant
hill occupied by several species of ants that detest each other. In
March, 2003, we took a stick and poked it into the giant ant hill to
rid it of Saddam, its militant and dangerous leader. But, when that was
done; what we did not expect was that the various species of ants would
start killing each other. Nor did we expect neighboring ant hills (read
Iran and Syria) to send some of their ants to join in the killing.
In politics, it is said, “Never interrupt your opponent while
he or she is busy committing political suicide.” So, the cold calculus
is that an American military presence in the Heartland of the Middle
East, i.e., Iraq provides two benefits: (1) It causes al-Qaeda to focus
its efforts in Iraq, rather than against us here at home and (2)
Islamists are killing each other at rates that would cause the ACLU and
other leftist organizations to go into orbit if U.S. forces were
racking up Muslim body counts that high.
The tragic downside is the loss of American lives and the
devastating impact that has on the families of our killed and wounded.
Meanwhile, North Korea appears to have caved in to our
military and diplomatic pressures and has shut down its five nuclear
reactors. So now, the folks to watch are the highly-secular,
congressional Democrats, who count on a U.S. defeat in Iraq to capture
the White House, and the highly-religious Iranians who are determined
to take over Iraq, either directly or indirectly. Geo-politics makes
for some pretty strange bedfellows.
Syndicated columnist and featured commentator for USA
Today, William Hamilton, is a Distinguished Graduate of the U.S. Naval
War College and a former research fellow at the U.S. Military History
Institute of the U.S. Army War College. He is a member of the
Association of Former Intelligence Officers. He is also the co-author
of The Grand Conspiracy and The Panama Conspiracy – two thrillers about
terrorism directed against the United States.
©2007. William Hamilton.
About
the Author:
Syndicated columnist, William Hamilton, is a Distinguished Graduate of
the U.S. Naval War College and a former research fellow at the U.S.
Military History Institute of the U.S. Army War College. He is the
co-author of The Grand Conspiracy and The Panama Conspiracy – two
thrillers about terrorism directed against the United States.
Posted on
Saturday, June 28, 2008
by William Hamilton, J.D., Ph.D.